Sitemap
Pages
- Graduate Application
- Intellectual Property Law
- Services
- Sectors
- International
- Insights
- Careers
- About Us
- 中文
- 日本語
- 한국어
- Contact Us
- Legal Notice
- Privacy Notice
- Sitemap
- Terms of Business
- Graduate Application – Equality & Diversity
- Graduate Application – Job Application
- Graduate Application – Personal Details
- Thank You
Posts by category
- Category: Featured news
- The need for (data) speed
- UK rights can still be enforced in EU, in spite of the triggering of Brexit
- CASE OF THE DAY: Leicester City Football Club 1 – 0 Leeds City Football Club
- An EU (SPINNING) class in trade marks becoming generic terms…
- Patents for self-driving cars under the microscope
- No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis
- Edible insects: Branding and Innovation
- BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Warner-Lambert’s painful Lyrica appeal
- 2018 Changes to the EPO’s Guidelines for Examination
- Legal 500 – Tier 1 for patents
- Lord Kitchin applies the “markedly different” infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-world
- Rangers secure trade mark RFC. No, they don’t mean ‘rugby football club’…
- EPO Guidelines for Examination 2018
- The Dearman Engine – power from thin air
- World Food Day! Patentable foods: The “Impossible” and the eggless
- Funding for Deep Technology: Interview with Paul Loustalan
- Between The (Spread) Sheets – Patentability of UIs in the US
- Rising Stars
- New guidelines from the EPO
- Japanese Automotive Companies being overtaken in the race for self-driving cars
- Planning for “No Deal” – IP Rights after Brexit
- Rise of the machines – Is Artificial Intelligence patentable?
- Plausibility and non-working embodiments
- More to clever packaging than just looks
- US claim construction at the English High Court – Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd v UCB & Celltech
- Is there a high chance of US and UK courts grappling with medicinal cannabis patents?
- Driverless cars take a step towards the streets of London
- CJEU rules that mutated organisms are covered by the GMO Directive
- Out with the old and in with not so new
- A Goodyear for Electric Vehicles
- UKIPO confirms that the UK will protect all existing EU trade marks and registered Community designs when the country leaves the EU
- Excluded Subject Matter: A Landmark Decision from the UK IPO
- One year later, how has Actavis v Eli Lilly impacted on patent scope in the UK?
- How autonomous vehicles will change IP strategies
- Court of Appeal grapples with novelty of overlapping ranges in Jushi v OCV
- Louboutin’s infamous red sole trade mark not considered to fall within the shape exclusions for trade mark protection
- Unbound London
- Green Channel Alternatives
- Kymouse’s stay of execution
- DeepMind: First major AI patent filings revealed
- Fold the phone… flexible devices?
- Court of Appeal sounds out the CJEU on the question of infringement jurisdiction
- The Meghan Markle & Friends Effect
- Celebrity tattoo artist’s prickly reaction to the name of a nearby cactus shop
- Secrets, Patents and Driverless Cars
- IP Stars
- The UK Ratifies the UPC
- Celebrating female inventors on World IP Day!
- Nestlé Cannot Catch a Break
- Regeneron v Kymab – Part 1: Sufficiency
- Regeneron v Kymab – Part II: Interpretation and Infringement
- Auf Wiedersehen, PET!
- MBL seminar on Conducting Effective IP Due Diligence
- China drives another record year for applications at WIPO
- Internet of Things – Anticipated Patenting Trends in Europe
- Reddie & Grose LLP appoints Alice Findlay as Partnership Chairman and promotes Paul Loustalan to Partner
- Quality vs quantity at the European Patent Office
- Some rules may be about to change, but is this going to change the game?
- Patenting the end of plastic pollution
- Validation of European Patents for Cambodia
- Mind The Gap! – How far are we from gender parity amongst Patent Inventors?
- Brexit Update: With just over a year to go, the European Commission published their draft withdrawal agreement on February 28th 2018
- Sky v SkyKick: Sky Plc’s claim for trade mark infringement is ‘kicked’ into the long grass
- Fashion Week brings a bit of fun with brand owners’ trade marks
- ‘Haters Gonna Hate’ – Taylor Swift shakes off copyright infringement claim
- Louboutin’s infamous red sole is potentially an invalid trade mark in Europe – just out is a second AG opinion
- Visit from UK IPO and JPO examiners
- Winter Olympics 2018: turbulence over Team GB skeleton suits
- Reddie & Grose opens office in Munich
- ALEXANDER the not-so-great
- UK IPO fee changes from 6 April 2018
- The limits of dictionaries in the interpretation of patent claims
- Good news for Coca-Cola trade marks in the EU
- Formally granted marketing authorisation required for SPC applications
- “Obvious to try” and clinical trials: Actavis v ICOS
- EPO study gives evidence for fourth industrial revolution
- The changing landscape of US Innovation
- Meghan Markle to boost the brand value of the British Monarchy?
- New pills instead of windmills – European Medicine Agency to relocate to Amsterdam
- Applying Actavis v Eli Lilly
- Best mode – an update
- Consumers not in the Knowledge – the shape of the London Taxi not distinctive enough to be a trade mark
- New Patent Prosecution Highway pilot programme launched
- New European Union Certification Marks
- Neural machine translation for patent documents
- Why you should pay your PCT fees: lessons learned from the EPO Board of Appeal decision J 19/16
- EPO Guidelines for Examination 2017 – a review of the changes
- UK IPO official patent fees to be increased
- The curse of being too catchy
- 2017 Trainee intake
- T 1983/14: The inescapable trap, but not as we know it
- Happy 400th birthday, GB1!
- IP rights following Brexit – the view from the EU
- The “Knead” for Trade Mark protection!
- UK IPO consultation on increasing official patent fees
- You’ll have to do better than that! An update on plausibility at the EPO
- Who is the notional businessman and does it matter?
- Coins and cloaking devices – just another day for Toyota
- The EPO publishes the first Unitary Patent Guide
- CRISPR – an update
- Scam Wars – A New Hope? Well, maybe…
- Significant EPO rule change affects patentability of plants and animals
- UK Supreme Court gives landmark decision on key infringement issues
- Quality service from the EPO?
- Thought about selling or buying IP at an auction?
- The retail industry takes off
- Introducing the FRAND injunction: not just any old injunction
- UPC delayed further
- Removing unwanted features from a patent claim – is the EPO getting stricter?
- Mergers & acquisitions: IP due diligence
- Patenting the fidget spinner
- Future innovation in Fintech
- Commencement of UPC is delayed
- Unwired Planet v Huawei – a FRAND in sight: licensing guidance from the UK court
- Record number of European patents granted, announces EPO
- A new UK unjustified threats regime – what does it mean for IP owners?
- Oh, gimme a break!
- Patenting activity and the price of oil
- Driverless cars: Grand Deft Autos
- New uses for old drugs – where’s the patent protection?
- Will the UK General Election affect the Unified Patent Court timetable?
- Examination success for R&G patents team
- Patenting the quantum realm
- Augmented reality colliding with sport: a win-win for spectators and participants
- Software and business method patents in China
- Make priority your first concern
- Artificial car noises and intellectual property protection
- Opting out of the Unified Patent Court
- What comes first – Brexit or the Unitary Patent?
- Fun with figures from the EPO Boards of Appeal
- Sailing against the wind in UK Appeal Court
- Positioning your brand on the trade marks register
- Fine tuning protection of IP in professional audio
- US CRISPR interference battle won by the Broad Institute
- Twelve of thirteen (or is it fourteen) – Italy ratifies the UPC
- Innocuous priority
- Solving mysteries with magical patents
- China patent applications top one million a year
- A broad base to the drive for device integration
- Trends in UK IP analysed
- A pointer on poisonous priority?
- Good news for patent applicants – validation in Europe just got cheaper
- Interpreting the EPC – a worrying development?
- Computer implemented inventions in the US – encouraging news on protection
- Nestlé reinvents sugar
- Changes to the EPO Guidelines for Examination
- Food for thought – patents protecting food-related inventions
- A Unitary Patent to be granted in 2017? Or perhaps not!
- Where’s your supporting data? Plausibility at the EPO
- Patent Box: An update
- Reddie & Grose retains top tier ranking in Chambers UK
- Dragons in the East
- The rise of the kite patent
- More musings on patentability in the United States McRo v Bandai
- Milan challenges London for its Unified Patent Court location
- Category: IP news
- Patent Box in the mainstream press
- Brexit – its effect is felt in IP filing statistics
- UK intellectual property office patents rules and design fees changes 2016
- What’s your priority?
- When looking in from the outside, the world of IP can appear confusing
- BASCOM vs AT&T – Patent eligibility vs Patentability
- Correct me if I’m wrong but…
- The European front of the CRISPR patent war
- Ambush marketing in the Olympics and rule 40 – does it really deter big brand owners?
- Extra copyright protection for designers
- A Japanese court decision suggests a patent with extended term may cover equivalent products
- When competitors threaten to infringe your patent, where do you draw the line?
- The EPO tackles its backlog
- Does IP provide a clue to team GB’s cycling dominance?
- Accelerated examination of US patent applications relating to cancer immunotherapy
- Will Ericsson’s master sale agreement to unwired planet come unstuck?
- GM crops are a seasonal matter
- UKIPO filing statistics viewed through a Brexit lens
- UK Patent Box – part of your business strategy?
- Brexit and the Unitary Patent
- Pokémon Go into the world of patents
- Trade secrets – the EU’s controversial new directive comes into force
- The EPO introduces streamlined opposition proceedings
- Plausibility in the UK
- UK votes to leave the EU – what now?
- And on that bombshell
- Touchdown on earth for space technology
- Patenting activity in the automotive industry
- Are you getting the most out of your UK patent?
- Patent eligibility of computer implemented inventions – recent US updates
- Italy getting closer to UPC ratification – is the finish line in sight for everyone?
- Developing a cure for a myriad afflictions?
- The future for cars: hybrid, battery or fuel cell?
- A method for mildly irritating patent trolls
- Copying film clips is just not fair
- Chopping down patent thickets with declaratory relief
- Death of the omnibus claim
- Trolls, unicorns, giants and patent litigation
- The FinTech revolution: file! file! file!
- China patent filings still booming
- Lay your cards on the table
- How bright is the UK’s solar future?
- Community Registered Designs – from suitcase to court case: the return journey
- Why doesn’t my patent give me freedom to operate?
- Speeding up prosecution at the EPO
- Patent term extensions in Japan – a question of identity
- Translating IP Translator and Article 28 outside Europe
- No fees for opting out of the Unified Patent Court
- Brexit – will there be any change for patent owners if the UK leaves the EU?
- Claim of thrones
- UPC update: nine down, four more to go
- How badly will the 3.5mm jack be missed?
- I recognise that shape – could it be a trade mark?
- Keeping up the PACE
- A new battle-front opens in the CRISPR patent wars – will it be the last great US interference?
- Figurative marks – the quest for clarity, consistency and certainty
- A Christmas present from the European Commission
- What next for biotech patenting in Australia?
- Calling all inventors: time to lock the garden shed?
- What has changed in the UPC regime in 2015 and what can we expect in 2016?
- None of this is real: the patentability of computer simulations in Europe
- The TMs, they are a changin’
- New FRAND developments in the UK high court
- As the PCT Direct service expands, is it time you went direct?
- Scanning for mistakes at the EPO
- Surprising benefits at the European patent office after the Alice v CLS US supreme court decision
- Poisonous priority – closer to an answer
- Patent Box: what are the proposed changes?
- Off-patent drugs bill filibustered
- Off-patent drugs bill second reading
- The Unified Patent Court update: representation rights for European patent attorneys
- Battle of the (fitness) bands – the start of another patent war?
- An update on the Italian position on the Unitary Patent Package – “Meglio tardi che mai”
- Toyota goes back to the future
- Increase in number of EP validation states
- Cars – the next big thing for the tech giants?
- Outsourcing manufacture to China: reduce your risk
- Innovation harvesting: how to recognise inventions and turn them into valuable IP
- Has the court of appeal found that 0.77 is greater than 1?
- 20+ years post-TRIPS – are submarines still out there?
- Software patents and expert systems – what do you recommend?
- Three things all entrepreneurs should know about intellectual property and crowdfunding
- Shiver me timbers! Digital pirates beware…
- Changes in Japanese patent practice
- Brexit – what could this mean for intellectual property?
- Renewing the focus on renewable energy
- Unitary Patent renewal fees – all you need to know
- Sofaworks v Sofa Workshop: CTM blow cushioned by passing off in the UK
- EPO global dossier service extends remit
- Alice Corp v CLS one year on: US patents for computer implemented inventions still being granted in large numbers
- Off-patent drugs bill revived!
- Sweet success for Cadbury?
- Have Tesla Motors changed down a gear?
- Patents: no use for product-by-process claims?
- EPO annual report: Europe continues strong growth, but UK fails to make its mark
- The Unified Patent Court: fees for opting out and opting back in
- Third strike, not out for Skype
- The unitary patent and unified patent court – another hurdle cleared
- Why you should worry about time zones (if you care about patents)
- Scrabble / scramble: why they shouldn’t have gone to Specsavers
- Time to print some new 3D laws?
- EPO enlarged board says “yes” to Tomatoes and Broccoli
- G 3/14: the Enlarged Board clarifies “clarity” in opposition proceedings
- Rihanna, Bob Marley, Robin Williams: image rights protection and trade mark registration
- ASOS v ASSOS: own-name defence saves ASOS from being wrecked on the rocks
- The EPO’s enlarged board clarifies clarity in opposition proceedings
- What protection do Swiss-type second medical use claims provide?
- Grace periods – good for Europe?
- Patents: A driving force in Formula One?
- There be dragons…
- Introduction to new Japan post-grant opposition system
- Amazon: drive-by printing anyone?
- Rubik’s cube: unlocking 3D trade marks
- US & Japan join the Hague system
- #CanIRegisterMyHashtag / domain name as my trade mark?
- SIMPLY not good enough: what happens when your mark is registered in one style and used in another?
- Use of a mark – the insight provided by Specsavers
- Africa is becoming part of Europe
- Centralised limitation of European patents – any opportunity to revamp your case on appeal?
- Patentable Parthenotes
- Poisonous priority – will the Enlarged Board of Appeal allow an antidote?
- UK’s attention to training pays off at European patent exams
- Construing claims without numbers
- The economics of intellectual property
- Unified patent update – spotlight on Spain, Malta & the UK
- Philips & Nintendo’s dispute
- Airbus reimagines flight
- Standards essential patents, the latest chapter
- PCT Direct: searching for Déjà Vu
- Unified Patent Court: an update
- Patent Box? Just call nein nein nein
- ‘Our reasons…are as innumerable as the stars’
- EPO issues updated guidelines for examination
- Obtaining patents is a prize-winning pursuit
- A non-binding opinion with a sting in the tail
- Open access publishing
- Investing in the intangible
- Things are speeding up (and probably slowing down) at the EPO
- Orange is not the only book, old fruit…
- Protecting your Cleantech ideas and innovations – IP and your business plan
- Introduction to IP changes under the Intellectual Property Act 2014
- Electronic patent marking
- Don’t miss out on the opportunity to comment on the latest UK IPO public consultation
- Patent checking is about to become cheaper and easier
- Show me the money – what is the value of intellectual property?
- Intellectual property in biotechnology fact sheet
- Agri-tech research in the UK – a major field of growth
- Scam wars – the UK IPO fights back
- Tesla Motors opens up
- The great yoghurt debate: possessing Greek style, but lacking Greek culture?
- Apple are told they can protect its retail store layout as a trade mark in Europe
- Survey evidence in trade mark proceedings – the parrot may not be quite dead but it’s very expensive
- Alice v CLS – how the Supreme Court case impacts patent applications in practice
- The EPO and the fine art of complaining
- I scream, you scream – we all scream for…milk and milk products?
- Honky tonk utility models
- Victory for Apple, but Samsung takes a bite
- WIPO to make written opinions on patentability available for third party inspection during the international phase
- Japanese patent decisions: Apple v Samsung – the grand panel decision of the IP high court
- I disclosed my invention at a public conference yesterday, can I still get valid protection for it?
- How the EPO can leave you feeling listless – Added subject matter at the EPO resulting from selections from multiple lists
- Will the 2014 Longitude Prize winner patent their technology?
- Definitive US supreme court case on the patentability of business methods
- UK Patent Box news
- Law Commission advises reform of groundless threats provisions
- Black and white marks creating grey all over – the new OHIM practice on black and white marks
- Compensation of employees for inventions continues to be an uphill struggle
- The CJEU gives BIMBOs the cold shoulder
- Unified patent court – Sweden ratifies, Denmark referendum gives the go ahead
- Changes to Japanese patent law – a new opposition system
- Post-grant central limitation in the EPO – a useful tool or a damp squib?
- The Court of Appeal applies the brakes on added matter
- The EPC and the right to be heard
- Changes to New Zealand patent law
- China – a new specialised IP court?
- Robotics: patent trends and future directions
- Community Registered Designs – from suitcase to court case
- ADR in patent agreements
- Japanese patent litigation: Samsung v Apple – the wrestlers in the ring
- Thank you for your (enhanced) cooperation?
- Update on the proposed European unitary patent and the unified patent court
- What does the Nagoya Protocol mean to you?
- IP rights – fundamental for a healthier future
- Patent trends in the hybrid-electric vehicle sector: onwards and upwards?
- Unitary patent court ratification: one step closer
- Tongue twisters in Bocacina v Boca Cafes: “the low cost court that uses costs to encourage lower future costs!”
- Pancake patent search falls flat
- The UK IP Bill: harmonizing UK and European design protection
- China trade marks – clarity on enforcement of colour combinations and changes to the law
- New European fees for filing cascaded divisional applications
- The Unitary Patent package: the Italian singularity
- Nestlé v Cadbury – the tale of the Kit Kat shape trade mark
- The UK IP Bill – definition of proposed criminal offence tightened up so as to more clearly target only intentional close copies
- UK IPO: patent prosecution highway and accelerated examination
- Patent trends in the clean energy sector
- NOW vs NOW – A warning against using ‘figleaf’ figurative elements in order to register descriptive or non-distinct words
- An overview of EP validation by country and technological sector
- Trade secrets: can you keep a secret?
- EPO refines rule 6 concerning the fee reductions associated with filing translations
- Santa Claus is coming to town
- UK Patent Box – taxing times?
- Added matter: is the EPO becoming less stringent?
- The World Intellectual Property Office’s green fingers: WIPO Green
- G2/13 Broccoli – the main ingredient again in EPO referral to the enlarged board
- gTLDS – practical steps to protect yourself in the expanding internet
- Free online advice from the IPO
- “Should I stay or should I go”? – court of appeal decision in IPCom GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Others
- SPC terms are set to change in the UK
- Inventive step at the EPO 80s style
- A new dawn for community trade marks and a new name thrown in too!
- EPO guidelines – updated yearly and consulted frequently
- EPO changes rule 164 concerning searches for applications lacking unity
- IP5 PPH: A step towards a truly international patent application?
- PCC restructured as the IPEC
- Important update concerning the deadline for filing European divisional applications
- US patent office enters the spirit of the January sales
- Austria becomes the first European Union state to ratify the unitary patent package
- Rise of the machine translations: Espacenet to translate Russian language documents
- Space: intellectual property’s final frontier
- The end of the road for superfast UK patents
- Law commission consultation: groundless threats
- US patent law change: the Leahy-Smith AIA update
- UK IPO updates guidelines for medical inventions
- When ‘use’ of a trade mark is not ‘genuine use’
- Shift amendments & unity – revisions to the examination guidelines in Japan
- US patentee burnt by on-sale bar through outsourcing
- The patent opinion service: a valued opinion?
- Injunctions to restrain potential infringement
- First to file: are laboratory notebooks now redundant?
- Threats and trade marks – a uniquely British issue
- Have you thought about utility models?
- Personalised medicine: a personal view on novelty in Europe
- Compulsory licensing developments in BRIC states following Natco v Bayer
- Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac Seats – overhaul of damages by the UK courts
- Translations at the EPO: “Es macht nichts wenn Sie nicht Deutsch sprechen”
- Notices from companies offering registration of copyright in the UK: official and unofficial registers for your IP rights
- Myriad Genetics: US supreme court rules on the patentability of isolated human genes
- A presentation and update on the unitary patent and the unified patent court
- Misleading “invoices” and other traps for the unwary
- Superfast patent processing in the UK
- Software and business methods: more playing around at the edges?
- Patents: when things go wrong
- Nestec v Dualit & Self-Collision
- US gets tough on patent trolls
- Nestec v Dualit: indirect infringement – wake up and smell the coffee
- IP translator – what have we seen in practice?
- Croatia will shortly join the EU – what does this mean for my IP portfolio?
- Less is more: what the Nestec v Dualit decision could mean for priority claims
- HTC v Apple: not all computer programs are excluded after all
- UK intellectual property law bill – criminalisation of the copying of registered designs?
- 3D printing and CAD files – don’t shoot the messenger
- Market surveys showing evidence of confusion – “let me say it again, but more loudly”
- Unitary patent update – the CJEU says “no” to Spain and Italy
- Meditations on mediation
- The UKIPO’s swift search and examination of patent applications
- CTMs – is use in one country enough?
- Consultation on a patents appointed person: a new appeal route
- Chinese year of the utility model?
- Beware of IP letters scam
- Patent box: changing the attitude of UK business towards IP?
- The latest word on replacement parts – where does repairing stop and making start?
- 5 reasons to start virtual patent marking today
- EPO breaks new record for filings
- Amazon’s gift order patent revoked
- The Japanese patent office: exporting services to South East Asia
- Clinical trials: the unitary patent and bolar exemptions
- The unified patent court: forum shop ’til you drop?
- More important than ever to protect software?
- Can anybody help SME?
- Consultation on EP rule changes
- Attack of the clones – defending your website
- In or out? – the UK in Europe
- Special delivery – the European unitary patent package
- Third party observations
- Australia ‘raises the bar’ for patentees
- China – protection of your trade marks
- European unitary patent – an historic agreement reached
- Is Santa Claus giving away more than just presents?
- China: possibly the most important place to file a patent application?
- Leahy-Smith AIA – a one way street?
- An attorney’s perspective on EPO policy
- Should you open the patent box? – tax benefits for innovation and patenting
- Bad Apple?
- Is your claim to priority valid?
- Patents county court: punching above it’s weight
- Should drug trials be allowed without the risk of patent infringement?
- Apple v Samsung “tablet” – losing is a bitter pill?
- EPO clarity objections: raising the bar too high?
- Petitions to the enlarged board of appeal – more hope than expectation?
- One court to rule them all?
- Is use of a CTM in one EU country enough to defend a non-use challenge?
- US punitive damages – A fairer hearing following the decision in Bard v Gore?
- The EPO’s new economic and scientific advisory board
- Double or quits – double patenting at the EPO
- Community registered designs – beware OHIM’s power to raise additional grounds of invalidity
- Changes in Indian trading regulations – what does this mean for brand owners?
- G02/10 – EPO expands possibility to use undisclosed disclaimers
- UK High Court takes a narrow view of mental act exclusion
- US patent reform update
- State of the art still uncertain after UK LG-Sony settlement
- A review of the latest developments towards a unitary European patent
- The hargreaves review
- UK IPO launch peer to patent initiative
- Localised goodwill and granting of limited relief in passing off cases
- US expected to make largest patent reform in 60 years
- US patent practice update: duty of candor and inequitable conduct
- Swiss-type claim practice for second medical uses from 28th January 2011
- US supreme court confirms the patentability of business methods
- G3/08 software related inventions
- National authorities disagree on CTMs when there’s use in only one country
- New European rule changes
- Category: R&G news
- Funding for Deep Technology
- Reddie & Grose welcomes new team members
- Dr Jonathan Davies – retirement
- New London office in 2017
- Award winning client announced
- Meet us at BIO 2016
- Meet us at INTA 2016
- Linda Harland is to retire at the end of March
- Meet us at AIPLA 2016
- Reddie & Grose achieves band 1 ranking in Chambers UK 2016
- Meet us at Advanced Engineering UK 2015
- Meet us at AIPPI 2015
- Andrew Carridge & Neil Thornton discuss Europe v US: the patentability of diagnostic claims
- Tom Sharman offers IP masterclass in professional engineering
- Cloud computing: patents and the art of semantics
- Reddie & Grose raises over £1000 for Cancer Research UK
- Michael Roberts and Daniel Shaw review Broccoli II and Tomatoes II in the Intellectual Property Magazine
- Tom Sharman quoted on UK IPO 2014 filing statistics
- Meet us at ECTA 2015
- Meet us at BIO Philadelphia 2015
- Meet us at INTA 2015
- Reddie & Grose LLP promotes four to partnership
- Tips for patenting computer games in Europe
- Reddie & Grose provides ‘prompt, thorough and practical legal insight’
- Jan Vleck & William Ponder ask if IP fits in your business plan
- Duncan Nevett & Gavin Dundas muse on Scottish independence and IP
- Alice Findlay quoted on IP pitfalls for an independent Scotland
- Reddie & Grose recommended in IAM Patent 1000 2014
- Meet us at INTA 2014
- Michael Roberts discusses life sciences in emerging markets
- Linda Harland pits the trade mark systems of the world against each other in Managing Intellectual Property
- Reddie & Grose is ‘excellent’ – Legal 500 2013
- AIPPI Japan – A presentation on European routes to protection: is too much choice a bad thing?
- Business innovation masterclass for SMEs
- Reddie & Grose is ‘seriously impressive’ – IAM Patent 1000
- Beyond the code – the art of intellectual property in a digital environment
- Reddie & Grose is ‘one of the top firms’ – Legal 500
- Reddie & Grose LLP are listed as a leading international patent prosecution firm
- Helen Wakerley discusses dangers facing internet brands
- Meet us at INTA 2012
- Cambridge office relocation
- Reddie & Grose LLP appoint two new partners
- Tom Sharman wins the Adrian Spencer Award
- Volcanic eruption in Iceland
- Category: Unitary Patent regime
People
- Alice Findlay
- Alan Bates
- Phil Bates
- Simon Goodman
- Steve Howe
- Patrick Lloyd
- Paul Loustalan
- Ian Loveless
- Nick Marlow
- Julie Millburn
- William Ponder
- Nick Reeve
- Julie Richardson
- Michael Roberts
- Aidan Robson
- Robert Sackin
- Pete Sadler
- Tom Sharman
- Gillian Taylor
- Neil Thornton
- Jan Vleck
- Helen Wakerley
- Georgina Ainscow
- Mark Bentall
- Andrew Carridge
- Dale Carter
- Andrea Civera
- Ian Dowling
- Sam Jinks
- Duncan Nevett
- Catherine Nursaw
- Jaime Choi
- Alex Cope
- Gavin Dundas
- Jon Gilbert
- Rose Hughes
- Adam Kelvey
- Stephen Lupini
- Justine Lynch
- Zack Mummery
- Emily Nytko-Lutz
- Petra Pecharová
- Juan Sánchez García
- Christopher Smith
- James Spencer
- Daniel Sullivan
- Jon West
- Dustin Bauer
- Harry Bedford
- Harriet Boswell
- Tom Bosworth
- James Burgess
- Hannah Burrows
- Connor Crickmore
- Andy Davies
- Filippa Evans
- Alexander Frank
- Joe Henderson
- Ben Hipwell
- Chris Howe
- Alex Maxwell-Keys
- Rob McLaughlin
- Edward Nelson
- Joshua Parsi
- Joanne Pham
- Adam Rimmer
- Isabelle Tate
- Bruce Torrance
- Matt Ward
- Robert Wiseman
- Gary Barker
- Grant Davies
- Matt Parkes
- Narendra Surti
- Johana Traill
- Elizabeth West
Roles
Sectors
- Advanced Engineering
- Biotechnology, Chemistry & Pharmaceuticals
- Cleantech & Energy
- Electronic & Electrical Devices
- Telecommunications, Broadcasting & Standards
- Medical Devices
- Computers & Software
- Consumer Products & Manufacturing
- Financial Services & Business Methods
- Branding & Design
Services
- Invention auditing
- Obtaining rights
- Patent disputes
- Patent oppositions
- Portfolios
- Protection strategies
- Third party rights
- Obtaining rights
- Portfolios
- Protection strategies
- Third party marks
- Trade mark disputes
- Trade mark oppositions
- Obtaining rights
- Enforcing rights
- Third party rights
- Portfolios
- Obtaining rights
- Product launches
- Design disputes
- Patents
- Trade marks
- Designs
- Plant varieties