Our services are centred around intellectual property that can be registered. We protect innovation, design, and branding across all sectors of industry, and at all stages in the supply chain.

For each IP right we offer services covering strategic advice, pre-registration searches, registrations and renewals, oppositions and dispute resolution. We handle work throughout the world, working with local colleagues in over 100 countries.


Our attorneys specialise in one or more sectors of industry, which enables them to provide quality advice with a commercial focus.

Our patent specialists have detailed understanding of the background technology, which ensures that your patent applications are prepared with the correct scope, reducing the likelihood of challenges from third parties and objections from the patent office.

They also advise whether other forms of protection would be more appropriate. Our brand specialists work with brand managers for leading brands and their advice is commercially focussed making sure that you get the best value from your budget.

Petitions to the enlarged board of appeal – more hope than expectation?


In 2008 the European Patent Convention was amended to allow parties of appeal proceedings to petition the Enlarged Board of Appeal to review decisions. The Enlarged Board is the European Patent Office’s highest appellate body and had previously only taken cases referred by the Boards of Appeal or the President of the EPO. The Enlarged Board’s role is to clarify the Convention and to resolve contradictory decisions from the Boards of Appeal.

There are only limited circumstances under which applicants or opponents can petition the Enlarged Board. These include a violation of the principle that decisions may be based only on grounds or evidence on which parties have had a chance to comment. Additionally, a petition can be filed on the basis that there was a fundamental procedural defect during the appeal.

It is interesting to see how petitions to the Enlarged Board have fared. Since its inception there have been about 85 petitions lodged. About 20 have still to be decided, but the decided cases show that the Enlarged Board are hard to convince. In the vast majority of cases the petition has been dismissed as inadmissible, unallowable or even ‘clearly’ unallowable. In a few cases the petition has been withdrawn. In fact we have only found 2 cases where the original decision has been set aside. In one of those cases it was found that the Board of Appeal had not given the parties a proper chance to discuss inventive step, mainly it seems through a misunderstanding during the hearing. In that case the Board of Appeal was ordered to reopen the proceedings.

With so few cases succeeding, does this mean that petitions are a waste of time? Well, no it does not. Many of the petitions are likely to be speculative and made by parties who have lost important cases; however slim the chances, parties will reason that it is worth making a petition, just in case. Clearly the Enlarged Board is not sympathetic to these petitions and it is not surprising that the vast majority fail. Encouragingly, the Enlarged Board has shown that it is prepared to reverse the Boards of Appeal where appropriate.

Most of us will probably never take a case to the Enlarged Board but in any appeal it is worth bearing in mind that the possibility exists.

This article is for general information only. Its content is not a statement of the law on any subject and does not constitute advice. Please contact Reddie & Grose LLP for advice before taking before any action in reliance on it.

Saved Staff
Staff member

Remove all

Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901
Call +44 (0)1223 360 350
Call +49 (0) 89 206054 267
Call +(00) 31 70 800 2162
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.