Our services are centred around intellectual property that can be registered. We protect innovation, design, and branding across all sectors of industry, and at all stages in the supply chain.

For each IP right we offer services covering strategic advice, pre-registration searches, registrations and renewals, oppositions and dispute resolution. We handle work throughout the world, working with local colleagues in over 100 countries.


Our attorneys specialise in one or more sectors of industry, which enables them to provide quality advice with a commercial focus.

Our patent specialists have detailed understanding of the background technology, which ensures that your patent applications are prepared with the correct scope, reducing the likelihood of challenges from third parties and objections from the patent office.

They also advise whether other forms of protection would be more appropriate. Our brand specialists work with brand managers for leading brands and their advice is commercially focussed making sure that you get the best value from your budget.

EPO guidelines – updated yearly and consulted frequently

8th Nov 2013

The European Patent Office (EPO) “Guidelines for Examination” is the internal manual setting out EPO procedures in all stages of the patent application process, from the formalities examination carried out on filing, through search, examination, patentability and post grant procedures such as opposition and limitation. The Guidelines are published by the EPO and are an invaluable source of information. For example, when faced with clarity, added subject-matter or inventive step objections, the Guidelines can often be used to gain an insight into how to craft a persuasive response. Better still, the Guidelines are available online (EPO Guidelines).

Last year, the EPO overhauled the update procedure. The Guidelines are now published as a new, complete edition every year. Tracked changes allow the reader to see how changes in regulations and case law have been adopted into EPO procedure. The latest updates reflect the EPO fine tuning their procedures and are summarised below.

  1. Translation requirements of priority documents during examination and/or opposition. The EPO can require you to file a translation of a priority document and set a deadline for doing so. If an applicant misses the deadline for filing the translation further processing is available but a further processing fee is due for each priority document for which a translation was requested.
  2. Relationship between the priority on a parent and its divisional applications. A priority claimed in a parent application applies to any divisional application provided that the parent application’s priority has not been lost or withdrawn by the date the divisional application is filed so that there is no necessity to claim the priority formally a second time during the divisional application process. After a divisional application is filed, the priority claims of the parent and divisional are treated separately; a priority claim can be withdrawn in respect of a divisional application yet retained in the parent application or vice versa.
  3. Clarification of the documents and fees required before an international application can make an early transition into the European regional phase.
  4. Clarity on the EPO procedure when an application is amended to claim an unsearched invention – European patent law does not allow an applicant to amend a European patent application to claim an unsearched invention. If during examination, an applicant tries to amend to an unsearched invention, the EPO must issue a communication repeating the lack of unity objection raised in the search stage before they can refuse the application
  5. “Notorious” Knowledge. The amended Guidelines clarify that where the technical aspects of computer-implemented inventions and business methods are so well known that their existence at the priority date cannot be reasonably disputed (so-called “notorious knowledge”) the search report need not cite any specific documents. Notorious knowledge should not be confused with “common general knowledge” which is the knowledge of an ordinary practitioner in the relevant technical field. As before, where the EPO assert that a technical aspect is common general knowledge this should be supported by basic handbooks and text books and can be contested if documentary evidence is not provided.

This article is for general information only. Its content is not a statement of the law on any subject and does not constitute advice. Please contact Reddie & Grose LLP for advice before taking before any action in reliance on it.

Julie Richardson
About the author

Would you like to know more? You can talk to Julie Richardson who will be able to help. Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901


Register for notifications
Enter your email address here to receive our monthly bulletin of IP news and developments.
    Please read our privacy notice.
Saved Staff
Staff member

Remove all

Saved profiles
Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901
Call +44 (0)1223 360 350
Call +49 (0) 89 206054 267
Call +(00) 31 70 800 2162