Our services are centred around intellectual property that can be registered. We protect innovation, design, and branding across all sectors of industry, and at all stages in the supply chain.

For each IP right we offer services covering strategic advice, pre-registration searches, registrations and renewals, oppositions and dispute resolution. We handle work throughout the world, working with local colleagues in over 100 countries.


Our attorneys specialise in one or more sectors of industry, which enables them to provide quality advice with a commercial focus.

Our patent specialists have detailed understanding of the background technology, which ensures that your patent applications are prepared with the correct scope, reducing the likelihood of challenges from third parties and objections from the patent office.

They also advise whether other forms of protection would be more appropriate. Our brand specialists work with brand managers for leading brands and their advice is commercially focussed making sure that you get the best value from your budget.

Community registered designs – beware OHIM’s power to raise additional grounds of invalidity

2nd Feb 2012

In a couple of recent cases (ICD 8384 and ICD 8249), The Community Designs Office (OHIM) has decided they are entitled to consider certain grounds for invalidity even when those grounds were not specifically raised in the validity challenge.

A Community Registered Design (CRD) is registered without examination of the merits of the application. An invalidity application may be filed by anyone at any time and most raise the question as to whether the design is new and different enough from earlier designs to justify protection as CRD.

But there’s another test for validity – so called “absolute grounds” of invalidity. Barred from registration a CRDs are:

  • (i) features of a product that are solely dictated by the product’s technical function – the function exclusion; and
  • (ii) features that must be reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit a product to be mechanically connected to or placed in, around or against another product so that either product can perform its function – the must-fit and must-match exclusions.

CRD owners beware: even if not in the invalidity pleadings, if the OHIM gets the hint of either of these issues (e.g. from the evidence in the case) they are likely to add these additional grounds for invalidity to those already raised by the challenger.  You may have more of a defence to prepare than you first imagined.

  1. Alicante News January 2012 Edition
  2. OHIM Decision No. ICD 8384 of 9 January 2012 (English)
  3. OHIM Decision No. ICD 8249 of 16 January 2012 (German)

This article is for general information only. Its content is not a statement of the law on any subject and does not constitute advice. Please contact Reddie & Grose LLP for advice before taking before any action in reliance on it.

Tom Sharman
About the author

Would you like to know more? You can talk to Tom Sharman who will be able to help. Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901


Register for notifications
Enter your email address here to receive our monthly bulletin of IP news and developments.
    Please read our privacy notice.
Saved Staff
Staff member

Remove all

Saved profiles
Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901
Call +44 (0)1223 360 350
Call +49 (0) 89 206054 267
Call +(00) 31 70 800 2162