Our services are centred around intellectual property that can be registered. We protect innovation, design, and branding across all sectors of industry, and at all stages in the supply chain.

For each IP right we offer services covering strategic advice, pre-registration searches, registrations and renewals, oppositions and dispute resolution. We handle work throughout the world, working with local colleagues in over 100 countries.


Our attorneys specialise in one or more sectors of industry, which enables them to provide quality advice with a commercial focus.

Our patent specialists have detailed understanding of the background technology, which ensures that your patent applications are prepared with the correct scope, reducing the likelihood of challenges from third parties and objections from the patent office.

They also advise whether other forms of protection would be more appropriate. Our brand specialists work with brand managers for leading brands and their advice is commercially focussed making sure that you get the best value from your budget.

Call for views on the future of artificial intelligence and the UK IP framework


The UK Intellectual Property Office published, on 7 September 2020, a call for views on the future of Artificial Intelligence and the UK IP framework here.

Interested parties, for example, those innovating using Artificial Intelligence, are invited to submit their views, by email, by the deadline of 11:45pm on 30 November 2020.

The views submitted may influence future UK IPO policy on how Artificial Intelligence is handled by the UK IPO. It is therefore important that interested parties submit their views.

Sixteen questions have been raised as part of the consultation, and they may be found here.

Some of the more contentious questions which will need to be answered are:

  • Should patent law allow AI to be identified as the sole or joint inventor? Recent decisions, reported here, by the UK IPO and European patent office have refused patent applications where AI was listed as the sole inventor.
  • If AI was named as sole or joint inventor of a patented invention, who or what should be entitled to own the patent?
  • Who is liable when AI infringes a patent, particularly when this action could not have been predicted by a human?
  • Could there be problems proving patent infringement by AI?

Given the UK IP framework was established to encourage innovation by human inventors and that we have seen a marked increase in the use of AI in many sectors, it will be interesting to see the number and range of views submitted.

This article is for general information only. Its content is not a statement of the law on any subject and does not constitute advice. Please contact Reddie & Grose LLP for advice before taking any action in reliance on it.

Saved Staff
Staff member

Remove all

Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901
Call +44 (0)1223 360 350
Call +49 (0) 89 206054 267
Call +(00) 31 70 800 2162
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.