Services

Our services are centred around intellectual property that can be registered. We protect innovation, design, and branding across all sectors of industry, and at all stages in the supply chain.

For each IP right we offer services covering strategic advice, pre-registration searches, registrations and renewals, oppositions and dispute resolution. We handle work throughout the world, working with local colleagues in over 100 countries.

Sectors

Our attorneys specialise in one or more sectors of industry, which enables them to provide quality advice with a commercial focus.

Our patent specialists have detailed understanding of the background technology, which ensures that your patent applications are prepared with the correct scope, reducing the likelihood of challenges from third parties and objections from the patent office.

They also advise whether other forms of protection would be more appropriate. Our brand specialists work with brand managers for leading brands and their advice is commercially focussed making sure that you get the best value from your budget.

In or out? – the UK in Europe


12th Feb 2013

The United Kingdom government has announced its desire to negotiate a new settlement with our European partners leading up to a UK referendum with a simple question, should we be in, or out. The premise for such an approach, we are told, is that too many powers are centralised with the European Union that should, instead, be left to the remit of individual member states. Where there is no need for centralisation or harmonisation, such as employment or other social provisions, the law of the national states should prevail. Europe, we are told, is a means to an end, not an end in itself.

It is against this backdrop that we consider the proposals for an EU unitary patent. We have had a functioning European patent system (separate from the European Union and created by the European Patent Convention) for over 30 years. So what purpose is there for an EU unitary Patent? For what end purpose is this the means?

For a small or medium sized company, surely the test is whether the company can obtain protection for their innovation in the jurisdictions of interest to them, at a cost that is appropriate given the nature of their business. More widely, for the economy as a whole, the test may be whether the system promotes investment in innovation leading to increased GDP. But one way or another, the cost of obtaining protection must be considered.

In the analysis produced by European legislators, the cost of obtaining a unitary patent is compared to the cost of obtaining a patent under the existing European Patent Convention in all possible member states. However, most businesses do not seek such protection in all possible states and instead typically seek protection in only 4 or 5 countries. The test for these businesses is whether the unitary patent will be cheaper. As matters stand, I fear that it will not.

The bottom line is not yet settled and there is further work to be done before such a unitary patent exists. In the meantime, when setting prices for obtaining and maintaining protection, it is hoped that the legislators will bear in mind that the unitary patent must be a means to an end, not an end in itself.

This article is for general information only. Its content is not a statement of the law on any subject and does not constitute advice. Please contact Reddie & Grose LLP for advice before taking before any action in reliance on it.

Author
Ian Loveless
Partner
About the author

Would you like to know more? You can talk to Ian Loveless who will be able to help. Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901

EmailVCard

Register for notifications
Enter your email address here to receive our monthly bulletin of IP news and developments.
    Please read our privacy notice.
Saved Staff
Staff member

Remove all

Saved profiles
Call +44 (0)20 7242 0901
Call +44 (0)1223 360 350
Call +49 (0) 89 206054 267
Call +(00) 31 70 800 2162